I think gender wars are silly.
Maybe it's because, as a child of the 70's, I came into womanhood in the 90's: long after the Women’s Lib movement had decided that the best way to get the bullies on the playground to show them some respect was to stop fighting with them and just pretend they weren’t there. Or maybe it's because my formative years were spent in a single mother household: a fact I neither bemoan nor regret as it laid a psychological foundation that has allowed me to see people as “people” first, and “man/woman” second (if at all; truth be told, I place “a credit to society” above gender any day, since my mother also taught me that a strong work ethic had nothing to do with whether or not you peed sitting down).
That said; I certainly respect Rachel Alexandra's connections in their decision to run her against her immediate peers in the Kentucky Oaks, rather than take on the colts in the next day’s Derby. But several fans of the sport were offended by the seeming sexist comments made in their post-race commentary, which included the following statement from Dolph Morrison, the “M” of L and M Partners LLC:
“The Triple Crown is the showcase of the future stallions of our industry ... Colts should run against colts, and fillies should run against fillies.”
Myriad bloggers responded, in varying degrees of outrage, post haste. As I read over the publications however, I admit I understood his point. In fact, I remain willing to concede to his way of thinking on one condition: that if we are going to cleanly gender-segregate the Sport of Kings, we need first to acknowledge the trials and accomplishments of the female of the species. Too much stock – too much
responsibility – is being placed on the stud, and as anyone familiar with basic biology will confirm: breeding does not happen with testicles alone. Need I point out that the non-Mr. P half of
Kingmambo is
Miesque? Just sayin’.
[Sidebar apropos to the above: has anyone else noted the fact that 7 of Medaglia d’Oro’s top 10 performers are 3yo fillies, including both Rachel Alexandra and GII Black-Eyed Susan winner Payton d’Oro? I’m sensing a future broodmare sire here.]
But I digress. The point of this post was not to tangent on the merits of the Blue Hen. Rather to review quickly the events of the past two weeks in time for the second jewel of the Triple Crown: the 134th running of the Preakness Stakes.
For those who missed it, mere days after Rachel Alexandra’s
exhibition of domination in the Oaks, she was
purchased privately by Jess Jackson’s Stonestreet Stables (you might remember him from such hooplah as Team Curlin and the
It’s A Sporting Gesture Band); who immediately
moved the filly to Steve Asmussen’s barn, declared the sport
should not be about the sexes, dropped $100k in supplemental fees to late-nominate the powerhouse filly to the Triple Crown, then secured
a commitment from Calvin Borel for the mount, and pre-entered his new acquisition to the 12th race on Pimlico’s 16 May card. No word yet if this decision will supersede the immediately-post-Oaks report that she’d be
Big Sandy bound to start the New York Filly Triple Crown, although chances are if she runs well against the boys here, she could well take on the Belmont.
And then, things got interesting. During interviews on HRTV and TVG, Ahmed Zayat (owner of Derby runner-up Pioneerof the Nile) made comment that he’d been contacted by Mark Allen (co-owner of the Derby winner, Mine That Bird), who informed Zayat of his intent to enter a second colt in the Preakness for the sole purpose of keeping Rachel Alexandra out. He allegedly sited similar views to Morrison’s (which in light of earlier comments about how they’d bought a gelding because they “
wanted a racehorse, not a stallion” seems suspiciously hypocritical, but he’s also been accused of
bribing a state official during the Alaskan public corruption scandal, so colour me shocked) and dropped co-conspirator names, including that of American Thoroughbred Aristocrat
Marylou Whitney. While Zayat initially agreed to the idea, he later changed his mind in the wake of a media backlash:
“Her former owner’s original plan was not to run in the Preakness. He said he had respect for the industry, and that the Triple Crown was to showcase the 3-year-old colts and future stallions. I have never heard of a jockey moving from a Kentucky Derby winner to ride another horse. I find it disrespectful for America’s most coveted race. Considering all these factors, along with what I heard from other owners and breeders, I decided I would do what was in the best interest for all of us. To be honest with you, I’m not playing saint and am not above everything else. I have a vested interest; it was a business decision … Nevertheless, after talking to the president of the Maryland Jockey Club I have decided I don’t want to be viewed as not being a sportsman, so I am happy not to block her for the good of the game. Please understand this is not about me; this is about the industry, and although what is right is not very clear to me I am happy to reconsider my decision for the fans.” BloodHorse
Suffice it to say, the conspiracy fell through and Rachel Alexandra was not only admitted to the field of 14, she was made the heavy Morning Line favourite of 8/5. And I can’t say as I find fault in the assignment. My early prediction is she takes it by 5.
With Borel subscribed to pilot the filly, Hall of Fame jockey Mike Smith has been tapped to pick up the mount on Derby winner Mine That Bird. While I’ve little doubt in mind that this year’s Run for the Roses was won by a lucky jock more than a talented horse (but please,
feel free to judge for yourself), I will give the gelded son of Birdstone a wary eye now that we know he can come from well of the pace – which happens to be a
Mike Smith specialty. All the same, I’m not convinced he can repeat the same effort twice in three weeks, and with a fair representation of early speed in the race I suspect he’ll fold early.
So Rachel Alexandra gets my top honours today: Not because she’s female, but because among one of the strongest crops of three-year-olds I’ve seen in recent years, she stands superior. Don’t agree?
Watch the Oaks again. The last time I saw a performance remotely like this, as it aired,
I was fourteen.
Finally, as a post-script: I know NBC did something similar in 2007, but I have this deep-buried recollection that, back in the spring of 1988, ABC ran a pre-race promo starring Winning Colors and Risen Star set to the tune of “Anything You Can Do, I Can Do Better”. Is anyone out there able to validate this for me? YouTube has failed in this respect, and I’m reasonably certain I’m not crazy...